Ask five mid-size nonprofits what they spend on software and you will get five different answers, mostly because nobody is adding up the same categories. The number that eventually gets reported to the board is usually the CRM line item alone — not the events platform, the payment processing fees, the email tool, or the spreadsheet-and-consultant workaround holding HR together.
For organizations in the $10M–$50M revenue range, software spend tends to cluster into a few predictable buckets: a donor CRM, a separate events and ticketing tool, online giving pages (sometimes bundled with the CRM, sometimes not), email and SMS, volunteer management, and payment processing fees layered on top of all of it. HR, hiring and time tracking are frequently absent entirely — not because the need is smaller, but because so few platforms serve nonprofits in that category at all.
List price is rarely the real number. Per-seat fees, transaction fees on giving, and the cost of a part-time staff member (or a consultant) reconciling data between systems all belong in the total — and they are usually where the biggest, least-visible spend hides.
The real comparison is never CRM versus CRM. It is everything you pay for versus everything one platform could cover.
Organizations that move from a patchwork of five or more tools to one platform consistently report two things: a lower combined annual cost, and a meaningful drop in the staff hours spent reconciling numbers between systems. The second number rarely shows up in a budget line, but it is often the one staff feel first.
List every tool, seat count and renewal date in one place. Bring it to any vendor conversation, including ours.
Read more →A migration checklist built around the nonprofit calendar, from data cleanup through parallel run and cutover.
Read more →
0 Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment.
Leave a Comment